A few years ago the entire world
was confused over the question of which economy was the best; capitalist or the
socialist. But now we all know what happened to both of them. Socialist economy
collapsed just after the fall of USSR and the entire communist bloc of Eastern
Europe. All these countries have modified their economic system and adopted
several good features of the capitalist economy. Recent financial crisis have
exposed the strength of capitalist economies in Europe and America where
governments had to step in to rescue their cracking economic systems. Thank God
now no two persons debate over the pros and cons of both the economic system.
The whole world very well knows that the best economic system is one that is
sustainable and must not work at the cost of our natural resources.
Is green economy a refuge?
No serious efforts are done in
any country for the transition to green economy that is not only viable in this
environmentally chaotic era but also a profitable option if it is adopted in
the longer term. If someone thinks that the green economy is simply the best
available option till a new system
is developed it means he is just taking it
as the best of the worst. With this mindset no one can reap its benefits that
are long-term in nature. People have to wait for some time to practically see
its blessings. Under this system of economic management whatever you do you do it
keeping in mind your tomorrow. If you use all your resources today just to earn
for tomorrow then what you would be doing tomorrow with empty hands for day
after tomorrow. This is the basic approach of green economy. Green is main hurdle for going green
Why countries are not serious to
adopt the system of green economy. Its answer is simple. In this race of advancing
the lifestyle by hook or crook, who will follow a system that asks you first to
wait and then think about the return. Nowadays everyone is running after the
get-rich-quick type of recipe and foolishly forget the disaster that one has to
face as a result of frenzy to earn more money in less time. Those who talk
about green way of living have to accept the title of being idealistic and they
are called people of ancient times. Talking about green way of living does not
mean someone is against the machine. A proponent of green economy simply wants
a rational use of machine in human life. It should be used where it can make
our life easy and comfortable. It must not be used at the cost of our natural
resources, health and well being. Who among us discusses with friends that in
what condition we are going to hand over this world to our coming generations?
This type of debate is usually considered philosophical or it is done when
people don’t have any other issue to pass the time.
We are part of a collective action
To make a transition to green
economy no doubt action at collective level is required but who are part of the
collective action. Obviously they are the individual who work together to bring
a collective change. Therefore, we being individual have to talk openly about
the benefits of green economy where every production is made keeping in full
view of our environment and natural resources. Under such system short term benefits
are abandoned for the long term permanent benefit of all types including
monetary, physical, social and health-wise.
Conclusion
So these are my non-scholarly
views about green economy that is under debate in every country but practical
steps are rare everywhere to bring it into the action. Some have excuse of the
pressure of the powerful lobbies of black energy producers and some others shed
tears over the blackmailing of big commercial giants. Our political leaders are
not ready to face such pressure because they just have to continue their
offices and for this they find safety in short term approach to lead the people
and put the world under the risk of fast depletion.
All of these countries have personalized their economic system and approved several good features of the capitalist economy.
ReplyDelete"HR Dissertation Papers"
very true
Delete